Thursday, January 03, 2008

New Hampshire! You're UP!

The MSM Lies
Let's see some common sense from the pragmatic people of New Hampshire. You know how the economy is going, you know how the Republican agenda is proceeding, hopefully you also know John Edwards is the only Democratic candidate who can beat all of the Republican candidates.

Edwards 2008 America Rising

Per Screamer Matthews it's still a race between Hillary and Obama. What is it that the media fears about John Edwards....hmmmmmmm?
Edwards 2008
Don't buy the bull and spin.

John Edwards, CAN WIN!


Buzz Off Matthews

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fucking drooling morons.

You devote this website to shitting all over Bush and you support one of his biggest enablers.

Dumbasses.

4:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, let's just ignore the suicidal idiot who posted first, shall we? Let him go suck moisture out of mud, and we will go forward.

Mr. Asta posed an interesting question about delegate votes at the Democratic Convention. What if the vote is split 3 ways and is too close for a decision. Mr. Asta claims that there is a time limit for such dithering.

Let's explore the idea of a deal breaker - that is - Al Gore steps up to the plate, his powder is dry, and he is elected by the delegates, with Edwards as his running mate.

Is this possible? Set me straight if I am wrong. But could it happen?

I anxiously await your thoughts.

3:51 PM  
Blogger Panda said...

Fuck you, anonymous coward. Drooling morons? Up yours! Biggest enablers? Let me guess, you're an Obama-the-religious-appeaser fan? The man who wants supposed "change" but talks of a "kingdom" of hope and bipartisanship? Right. That's gotten us so far...to the Republicans bipartisanship means they step on us and crush us. It's a sign of weakness.
John Edwards is a fighter. Shove it, you nasty cowardly asshole!

1:15 PM  
Blogger Panda said...

Asta....that's the dream ticket. Gore and Edwards. Yes, it technically could happen. Gore would win the general election in a massive landslide. If Gore won't run, I'm supporting Edwards. He's the only one running who has any fight in him to take on the corporations who now have us all by the short and curlies.

But ANY Democrat is better than ANY Republican. And Repub lite, i.e. Hillary or Obama, is simply unacceptable to me. Decades of this bullshit has worn me down. I'm ready for a BIG fight. If we don't fight hard this time our country is finished. The decline of America is in full swing.

1:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was leaning heavily towards Edwards, and intended to vote for him, chiefly because of his seemingly adamant advocacy of the disenfranchised.

I may still vote for him -- if he can explain how someone who has made a career of defending the defenseless and disadvantaged could, during a debate televised nationally, despicably and counterintuitvely team up with a fellow debater to harshly and spitefully criticize the only woman on the podium.

In truth, the spectacle came across as a form of rhetorical gang rape.

10:20 PM  
Blogger Panda said...

Gaia, I don't think Edwards harshly and/or spitefully criticized the only woman on the podium, at least, not due to her gender. It's not about her being a woman...it's because she supports Zionism and takes money from K Street lobbyists.
As a longtime feminist myself, I can't support Hillary...I will vote for her if she's my only alternative to another Republican. But, while I still have a voice, I choose Edwards over her. He cares. She panders.

10:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, I saw your graphics posted on DU and now that I've had a look at your blog I see you're good, really good. Love your stuff. Keep it up.

I'm biased, I'm an Edwards fan too.

4:27 PM  
Blogger Panda said...

WOW! Thanks, Sally. I didn't see the DU posting but I'll be sure to look now.
Thank you very much. :)

10:12 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home